Thanks Mycroft. I might get to that one day when I have a suitable space, but I have a few more basic things to sort out following my house move first - like a heated bathroom and a boiler that isn't clapped out and only capable of running half a bath. Sheer luxury for me though all the same, last year I mainly just stayed dirty cos my old bathroom was the worst room in the house being only a wooden dormer so everything came straight in full tilt.

My new dream house is like stepping back to a more blissful time - zero all round 24/7 on the rad meter, you'd love it. (Dreamt of living here 50 years ago as a child, it's my earliest remembered prophetic Dream come true) I'm still on cloud nine just to be here after the closest shave yet at my old place - a full year or so with local upgraded air port radar 24/7 on top of neighbours' stray whyfry and phones increasing all round, my BMI dropped to less than 16, just couldn't even assimilate the food in the end. I've been completely astounded that so many 'wrongs' which I thought were intrinsic to me have simply gone now I'm here - even very subtle things like self esteem and my feeling about recent bereavement are quite different without the brain fog.

There's been no personal attack from me. You asking to be pointed to one single paper is lame, a very feeble excuse for not getting informed. Anyone can see you're in denial, so it's no insult if I mention that, how else will you ever realise you've been duped into slow cook culling yourself and others?

If you do pluck up the courage to risk finding out something inconvenient by looking at any of my links, you'll soon see that proper evidence is overwhelming, and not nonsense like that Essex bs. Unless you do go off and read any one of the links provided, then all you're doing is further demonstrating ignorant denial. As I said, it makes no odds to me, I already know what's what, and no one here believes you anyway, so nothing more for me to say. I'll leave you to your precious deVices, you're obviously too hooked to see what you've bought in to.

It's not difficult at all, I just don't jump cos someone tells me to.

The fact that you are constructing such a lame excuse in your own mind (ie complaining that I'm not spoon feeding you a particular paper) as justification for not just jumping in anywhere to find out for yourself shows you don't want to know, like the majority. Pity for you and all there's no safety in numbers on this issue.

Yes that's what I call science. I also rate AAEM physicians as scientists too, and there's no ambiguity in their conclusions.
American Academy of Environmental Medicine Recommendations Regarding
Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Exposure -
"Physicians of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine recognize that patients are
being adversely impacted by electromagnetic frequency (EMF) and radio frequency (RF)
fields"

Essex?- do you really think that's a proper university? (no offence to anyone who went there and learned something useful, not paid for by telecoms industry - http://www.mastsanity.org/index.php/media-/-press/160-press-release-essex-study-examined-the-publicised-conclusions-are-not-supported-by-the-results.html) That Essex bs always gets trotted out, perhaps there isn't anything better than that to dredge up.  Do you really think that's 'proper' enquiry? Same tactics used there as are used to disprove RV - make sure you don't ask the right questions and you're guaranteed to get a negative answer to disprove what you didn't even look for in the first place. Citing short term supposed effects like cold and flu symptoms, lol, I've never ever even heard an electrosensitive reporting such symptoms or having such minor or short term concerns. You don't get cancer instantly!

Like I said take your pick from the thousands of papers in those links (they're all proper science) or better still don't bother just stick your head straight back in the sand, it makes no odds to me. Or watch this http://iemfa.org/index.php/media-info/videos - not watched it myself (old news to me) just received it in my mail box, but it says it "examines 60 years of scientific research, to uncover for the very first time, the actual mechanisms by which mobile phone technology can cause cancer." so should fill any knowledge gap.

Calling me for 'nonsense' over solid science..

OK, show me the research paper proving the serious science in any one of your nonsense theories.

Take your pick, there's thousands -

"The AAEM recommends that physicians consider patients’ total electromagnetic exposure
in their diagnosis and treatment, as well as recognition that electromagnetic and
radio frequency field exposure may be an underlying cause of a patient’s disease process." - http://aaemonline.org/AAEMEMFmedicalconditions.pdf

http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/resources/resources-scientific-studies-into-the-health-effects-of-emr/
http://www.justproveit.net/studies

LMAO actually, dark, dark humour reaches where niceness won't go.

Calling me for 'nonsense' over solid science in this oh so sirious apparition discussion, LOL!

Dark days indeed.
Darker every year.
Blanket RF smog under blanket denial.

Tell me it's nonsense as much as you like but no one here believes you and you'll need a better explanation than that to tell y/our children. Every cell of your body is as affected by unnatural RF as every other cell is in every other creature - even manufacturers acknowledge some of the known risks in their contract small print (to cover themselves against the real risk of future claims against them)

Great info link lorraine and when you think of all your neighbors varying wifi strengths penetrating your abode also t.v radio micro waves, is it too late to wear a tinfoil or lead based cap.
New world order have the ultimate depopulation wifi killing machine. boost the frequency and let Haarp type technology finish the task. unless your a remote viewer
and have developed a natural defense. hmmm interesting thought maybe the hierarchy know we are on to them and are keeping rving down on that purpose.
 

Gerry  

Gerry ... as far as I know no one, not even remote viewers, has any chance of acquiring natural defence within a life span. Epigenetics might! cut in in time and save some, though this blanket selfrazzling is the most drastic man-made environmental change evolution has ever had to respond to, and the pace of change is astronomical, so really it's a huge gamble whether we'll completely cook ourselves extinct or not. Unnatural EMFs are harmful to all living organisms, not just those who are consciously aware of the sensations/symptoms, and there's absolutely no evidence yet of any defensive immune response emerging. Quite opposite in fact - it's been shown eg that autistics, like me, can not excrete heavy metals whilst in whyfry fields (I'm snookered with a dozen mercury fillings, cos surgery clinics and hospitals have long been mobLie phone/whyfry no go zones for me)

These last 15 years or so the only effective solution I've found has been avoidance. Pulsed microwave signals completely trash immune systems and disrupt all significant biological and mental processes, from fundamental cellular physiology (baby girls whyfryed 24/7 will be guaranteed infertile by the time they leave school) right through to behavioural psychology (every single city police force in the world that's switched to the new super frazzling tetra radio communication since 2009 has shown immediate marked increase in reported incidence of police brutality)

If you know different then tell me right now please! I'm extremely electrosensitive (btw, most sensibly in Germany they use the label electrosensible) and have narrowly escaped death twice already during the time it took to organise moving out of houses after external RF pollution invaded. This time we've moved to a very rural place beyond time with no neighbours, only 2G from one quite distant mast - just about enough broadband, and the engineer who came to connect our phone line assured us we're very unlikely to ever get upgraded to 4G.

... well said Tunde.

And phones are not the worst of it ... guaranteed to kill more are the immediate mega threats of whyfry in schools and smheart meters in homes!

Whyfry is KNOWN TO BE extremely damaging to health. Depopulation isn't going to take long unless more people act to save themselves from it's effects - http://stopsmartmeters.org.uk/wireless-radiation-see-it-measured/

Good idea Chris, it seems like you now understand the beauty of being blind to be certain of being impartially non-locally aware. I think it can only help to 'clear the slate' for the viewer to some (unquantifiable) degree if you limit your assumptions about the target, even if only by identifying where they exist within your own prior understanding of the target and in your interpretation of Mal's session. You can't 'unknow' the target, but you can put aside all subjective assumptions.