Hi Neovitalis,

A word of warning there ....

About 2 years ago, I offered to RV a Target that someone, unknow to me, posted on this forum. Big mistake. This is what happened...

I RV'd the Target ... being very enthusiastic having just started practising RV.
Even though I was new to RV at the time, I did connect with the target.. it was a very strange and unpleasant experience.
I connected with something dark and nasty that was very unpleasant when I viewed the scene.
I kept getting the image of a growling animal/creature/thing with big teeth jumping around what looked like containers in a dock at night.
It was not a normal animal - it was something else ... very nasty and very dangerous.
After the session of about 20mins ... I felt, physically, very sick for about 3 hours.
Very nasty and very unpleasant.

So, the moral of the story .... never, ever accept target from strangers.

As a post script to the story .... the sender of the target gave feedback on the target. This guy was involved in black magic/dark witchcraft ....
something like that and he claimed the target was a demon with some strange-sounding name.

So, be careful my friend....

I suggest you name the individual tasker. That actually helps people avoid an incompetent or negligent tasker.

I know Aaron C Hanson has set such tasks, but he is a self confessed joker, and I doubt very much he is the only such mis-tasker.

Bear in mind that ARV is another variant specifically designed to find answers to binary questions.

Actually if you check out eight martinis, you will find a range of organisations who MAY offer ARV as a service, at a price.

Like any other RV service, it's only going to be as good as the questions / queries submitted to the process. That's my main point.

The concepts found within movies are what you expect to find in movies. Source Code was another example.

Leave the movie stuff in the movies is my take on it. Truth is way stranger than that depicted by Hollywood.

Mind you, the concepts of a Psi based law enforcement was in sci-fi comics a long time before RV came out of shadowland. Check out Judge Dredd - in comic form in the late 70s.

Get my drift? Fictionalised sci-fi just might hit on concepts that are found to have some validity later. It's not just the RV story affecting the media, it also happens the other way around.

and so they tweak things a bit, for to guarantee it. We can almost see a parallel here to Sally Moran's use of ear piece intercom on stage.

Look, this video was carefullly filmed and cut together. It's not a live event, it's a reconstruction. Reason I say that is there is live footage of the Outbounder and the viewer - you think this guy had two cameras rolling at the live event?

I don't buy that. Telling when a video is clearly not a live example of RV is pretty important in judging whether it was a fair attempt, and insisting on a live communication channel with the outbounder was a protocol breach.

Protocol - a given standard for COMMUNICATION. Especially used in business and diplomacy. And this person may well produce good, consistent results, but psychic funcitoning is NOT RV.

The reason for testing under blind conditions is to prove viewer capability by closing off any possible ways apart from the paranormal that could have been used to glean information. The video is a fail on that front.

It's what keeps RV separate from the "tinfoil hat" community, much as they thirst for a "great spiritual union", ie "throw away the science because we can't actually do science"... screw that approach.

Well... if there is one thing I've learned about pre-cognition, it is that paranoia and negativitiy can come heavily into play.

If people see a problem, a more thorough approach is to find viable alternative solutions? And do them?

Also, nuclear reactors (present designs anyway) need large water sources. That isn't always the sea but river estuary locations are primo. I'm not saying that's a good fact or a bad fact, but it is a fact.

Technically any spot on Earth is an "Earthquake zone". It's a question of number of years versus magnitude of event. Some are much more stable than others but the design should suit the location - if a design isn't capable of withstanding a given size event without a breach to the reactor core, it's not a viable design.

See, there's a certain amount of "natural" elements and certain constraints of "manmade" elements. Nuclear energy has consequences, and some would argue that it can never be "safe" in the way that say, hydro-electric is "safe". From what I understand, core breach in every nuclear accident was done by the core itself running meltdown. That's the condition to prevent, and quite a few people are now thinking "not having nuclear fission power plants would prevent that."

Not having nuclear reactors at all would prevent future production of plutonium, not mining uranium would mean no weapons grade or depleted uranium, but are there viable alternatives in terms of power generation? I think there could well be, but power generators as we understand them today have to be revolutionised, different scales of power generation and distribution, for the "nominal ideal" which has greatest benefit and least negative impact.

Going that route in a positive manner seems a much more useful goal than positing possible asteroid impacts... pro positive versus warning with no explanation of possible solutions.

Depends on the return of A data really - it depends on each target and each session.

If I've got no data after my third repitition above decoding the ideogram's shape and form then I'll generally stop and retry at a later time.

More rarely, sometimes I'm just getting AOL and I know it (SCWERL, or "squirrel", Stray Cat Wrecking Everything Running Loose). That's nearly always a bad cool down - I'm not "in the zone", operating close or at theta levels of relaxed, can-do focus.

If I'm getting some extra data after 3 or more that feels harmonic, ie "true", then I'll carry on.

So typically I'll do 3 or more but that's not to say every time I get some data from it - maybe 90% of the time or more, I'm OK with stage 1.

I have carried on with targets without that but I'm never happy if I feel the initial data was badly done (I have included all the B data and rejected all the A initial data - a very silly thing to do).

[You might say it is slightly and intentionally emphasizing one known source of data: the viewer's visceral (to the degree possible) response to feedback. This has a lot of 'little psychological things' that spiral out from it, e.g. that the viewer may simply find practice more interesting when there is some greater aesthetic sense with their feedbacks.]

The main point of 'quality' photo feedback -- assuming that even for low quality we're still talking about decent color etc. being present -- isn't necessarily that you get more feedback from pixels you can't even consciously even differentiate (e.g. that the image is larger or higher resolution), although there might be something to it. But more as a side-effect of that: the feedback as a data source and as a 'trigger.' You might say it is slightly and intentionally emphasizing one known source of data: the viewer's visceral (to the degree possible) response to feedback. This has a lot of 'little psychological things' that spiral out from it, e.g. that the viewer may simply find practice more interesting when there is some greater aesthetic sense with their feedbacks.

Exactly. Keeping the viewer happy with viewing is a task that many taskers fail to consider.



[/quote]

A 300 metre wide asteroid would hurt, but it's not a humanity killer. Put the matter in perspective. Yes it's a good idea to develop monitoring and counter-impact systems based on visual and radar astronomy.

Trying to match astronomical events with gut feelings of doom isn't helpful.

Fukushima was preventable OUTSIDE of the capitalist "less cost is best" thinking.

Triple redundancy on the cooling systems would have prevented it. Forward thinking as to how to keep the cooling working in emergency circumstances. However, "economy" is a loaded word about investing less and exploiting more, and if I were to single out ONE particular nation that is incredibly awful at this, it would be my own (the UK).

Tell that to a bankster. Even better, confine them within the irradiated zone - why shouldn't they live with the consequences of their folly? "We're all in this together" is a glibly delivered lie.

Not Remote Viewing.

"Psychic Functioning Within a Double Blind Protocol".

The Viewer had the Outbounder's phone number. Communication with the Outbounder while viewing? Not double blind.

Also, mobile phone locations can be traced by the number, although the facitilities for doing so are not usually available to US citizens.

Nice hype. Nice splash. Nice commercial. Nice trying to jump on a bandwagon by a medium.

Nothing to do with remote viewing. They could be entirely genuine, but I doubt they could work double blind. If they could, why didn;'t they?

No sooner has the Apocalypse proved to be a damp squib than the next big Apocalypse comes along.

More blades. More doom. Yes, this Apocalypse is the real deal. With extra Apo- and ultra level -Calypse.

May I just be the first Anglo Saxon to say;-

Pull the other one. It's got bells on.