ARV Tips and Hints

RV Protocol

GO VIEW! @TKR's dojo

Project Home Page

RV webForum (here!)

Email: @Yahoo|@Google

Help make it possible for everyone!

TKR is Funded by:
PJ of Dojo Psi

Simple Session

CS Labs
Ingo Swann
Joe McMoneagle

Baylands Nature Preserve
Pete's Harbor Restaurant
Lucid Dream Example
Radio Listening Post
Test-Bed Trials
Video ABC Put to the Test

P.I.A.

Greg K's ARV Trials

RV Roast (alt)

RV Library

[Entmu]

If you have tips to improve precognitive style RV in the form of ARV, please post up here. This may include improving accuracy, or quality of the session in general.

One I started with was viewing the complementary outcome as a separate trial, as found in Gene's thread on the statistics and probability of results.

Some hints:

I have found the most accurate and relevant data comes from the earliest moments after giving the task.

The images too vivid and clear are the furthest off base.

I have increase accuracy by taking a deep and detailed look at the images on feedback day, and really working on putting them into long-term memory.

I liken this to trying to remember an image ten years later as similar to seeing it happen ten days before. Burn the image into your mind. Draw the exact shape and outline of it exactly in your mind. Make it vivid as possible. "Metaphorize it." A tidal wave is a giant blue elephant stomping around devastating a city. A fire burns your hand. It has hair. Firey hair.

http://www.weatherstock.com/WV4.jpg

http://www.rubyriver.com/Sizzler/fire.jpg

Any little idea that helps, even if you think it is silly, please post up.

[Gene]

I would heartily agree on the earliest data being the most relevant.  I spent a long while doing ARV sessions using a full blown TRV methodology, with summary and analysis etc this would take me well into an hour.  Here was the problem that produced in ARV.  I would eventually, perhaps out of sheer boredom go to the other target at some point and then begin to bounce between the two (Which I'm sure was just great fun) but not good for accuracy.  I could pinpoint after feedback where it had happened also.  It would start where the two targets (Yes I see them both, as I learned that doing my own judging was best for me) had something in common; oh lets say the wheel of a car and a ferris wheel at a carnival as an example.  It might have been that the car was the target and I would be going along just fine collecting all manner of data then pressing just a bit too much on what was this round thing and what is this movement I'm getting, well I would just jump right over to that far more exiting round thing that also had movement along with bright lights, and happy faces, etc.  Then when exploring that and running across metal I might just move back to the big hunk of metal in the car that had all kinds of things going on inside it and was providing all the power for the car.

So eventually, and for me this was a hard thing to accept as I was, and still am to some degree, married to a full blown TRV methodology.  But in the end I found that doing a short, maybe 10 minute more freestyle/fun type of session produced better results and also allowed me the time and mental energy to do multiple sessions on the same target.

The other, and Greg K. mentioned this in his visit to the chat room, which is logged for your reading btw; is that you need to accept that regardless of how right on your results are, sometimes you will simply be wrong.  This is livable as long as you plan for it accordingly and accept it up front.

To reiterate this I will mention what was for me the worst trading day of my life.  I was using ARV to trade the S&P futures market and over the weekend I had done three sessions on what was going to happen on Monday.  Well let me tell you that I had three of perhaps the best sessions of my life.  I described, sketched, and in two instances literally named what my targets were; and all three sessions matched with what they said, which was that the market was going to go down.  It was freaking disasterous as the more it climbed the more I was sure it would HAVE TO tank before the end of the day and I even reentered the market after my stop was hit, a big no no for trading.  Someday, in a thousand years or so I hope the memory of it will fade.  In any event, believe and know you can be wrong.

Gene Smith

[fls13]

My big issue with stock trading based on ARV is you can be right 9 out of 10 times and still lose money.

[Entmu]

Why not try your hand at the casino. If you play Baccarat and are right 9/10, and you bet well, you will come out on top. If that were $1000 a hand, you would be up $8000. With good nesting and complementary trials, you could come out a winner. Plan well and analyze feedback well.

[Gene]

My big issue with stock trading based on ARV is you can be right 9 out of 10 times and still lose money.

fls, If you are able to hit 9 out of 10 correctly let me assure you there are mulitple venues in markets where you will make a lot of money.

In all seriousness, if I could be correct in my calls 9 of 10 times I would be able to buy a small country within a few years.  I'm not being a smarty here either.  Publically demonstrate you're able to hit at this level consistantly for say a month and you would have people lined up from here to the mississippi river, all with bushel baskets of money just begging you to come work for them.

Gene

[xerophyte]

Yeah,

There are books on betting patterns you can use. They take advantage of any non-randomness, bit long winded and I haven't tried it with RV but should work. If you're interested I'll get the title, it's around somewhere.

Say you had a winning streak followed by the opposite, the betting will result in a profit ;-)

[Joe_Black]

gene, did you ever consider after a 45 minute session using another mins to do a ARV target? A. your mind won't be with it long enought to get bored and will welcome the change. B. you should get that good data without having to wait.

I know TRV methodology say this is a no no but it works.

[fls13]

"if I could be correct in my calls 9 of 10 times I would be able to buy a small country within a few years."

I'm sure you're right, Gene. I guess I don't understand the more exotic markets well enough and a protocol pratical enough to make ARV work there.

My approach has always been, "Buy low and sell high."  

[Marv]

1: View the image you`re going to see at a designated time.

2: Pick a target image that closely matches whatever it is you`ve viewed. Pick another that clearly doesn`t.

3: Give these 2 targets to your ARV partner and ask them to assign a YES outcome to one target, a NO outcome to the other. Obviously this is done secretly, away from yourself.

4: Now show them your data and ask them to match it to the image that fits best. Get them to place a bet according to the indicated outcome.

5: Wait until the results are in and at the designated time ask to see the image with the correct outcome attached. Obviously this will be a perfect match with what you actually viewed...and obviously your partner will have bet the right way...

Anyone tried this? Seems TOO simple yet I`m having difficulty figuring out why it shouldn`t work...forgive my stupidity if I`m tinkering with a howler here...

Marv  :-/

[Joe_Black]

Look at jack houcks stuff on ARV its on the web. He has alot of information needed to 'do it right' and get the results.

Username:
Password: