Thank you PJ, Mycroft and Jon K for your input on this subject!
Thanks for the links too Mycroft.
Jon K wrote "Could you please cite where any of these folks have referred to the use of and/or recommended auditory subliminal messages for remote viewing? (If that is what you are referring to.) Not saying they haven't but if so, doesn't seem to be a high priority for any of them, from what I have read."
No, none of them specifically said that subliminals were used for remote viewing whatsoever. But they referred to them in a few videos I have, just in general. Paul mentions subliminals on a video called "Psychic Spies: The Remote Viewing DVD Learning Series" where he shows if you flash half of a picture to the right side of the brain and some other stuff, and how it's perceived unconsciously.
Lyn Buchanan says very clearly on the video called "Remote Viewing Methods: Remote Viewing & Remote Influencing" and says " You would be amazed at what a person can pick up subliminally if they are in another room and you are talking about something in the next room" and then he says " Is it fair to use subliminals on someone elses mind, etc". He obviously is a believer in them, even on the cover it says "Subliminal messages have been embedded in this dvd" I forget what the rest of it said.
Jon K also wrote, "Who is saying "the subconscious has no words"?
On the Remote influencing dvd I mentioned above, Lyn says a few times that when you remote influence, You do not use words, just pictures, feelings, emotions, because the subconscious mind can't handle them. Ed Dames on his video "Operation Mindazzle" and I quote " the subconscious has no words or language" the subconscious doesn't understand words.
And I thought that's the reason people use ARV is because words, text, numbers have no meaning to the subconscious? But I'm fairly new to this stuff.
I agree, I would think the subconscious mind could indeed handle words, like Jon K said when we Dream we understand words, and that's the subconscious mind running the dream. I would say "Yes" it does understand words. That is why I was surprised when Lyn basically said Subliminals are real and then later, he say's you don't use words to influence the subconscious, translate what you want into feelings, emotions, pictures, etc. But then later on the same tape he says when he is doing an RI session, he writes it out, both words and pictures, when he was attempting to lower Prudence Calabrese's blood pressure etc. I mean if the subconscious didn't understand words , then what's the point of writing out your scenerio when you RI? And Ed Dames said "The subconcsious has no words or language" but then later on the same tape he says when you're Remote viewing "information can come in the form of a sense or a word might pop into your mind" and says this is information coming from the subconscious being dumped into your conscious. So why did he earlier in the tape say "the subconscious has no words or language".
Anyway, Like PJ said, there's definately conflicting opinions and that big experiment telling people to buy popcorn in theaters back in the 50's turned out to be exagerated from what I read in a couple books on subliminals. I still think they probably work for some people as long as they are not buried too deep in the audio (for audio subliminals). I guess the only way is to try it and if it seems to work, then it works ... if not then it doesn't. Self Hypnosis seems to work better for me personally, but then I just tried regular subliminals. Anyway, thanks everyone.