Your Mission, Your Keyboard

Project Home Page

RVwebForum

TKR @the Dojo Psi

Help make it possible for everyone.

RV CHAT

Monday Nights
9:30-11:30pm Eastern
6:30-8:30pm Pacific
dojopsi.com/chat/

Weekly RV Chat

CS Labs
Ingo Swann
Joe McMoneagle

Baylands Nature Preserve
Pete's Harbor Restaurant
Lucid Dream Example
Radio Listening Post
Test-Bed Trials
Video ABC Put to the Test

The Home Made Viewer

P.I.A.

TKR Blog

Noetic Vision

Serious Kilowatt

Red Cairo

Cosmic Spoon

Psychic Journey

Psyforce

Remote Review

MindBlogging

BadMoJoe

Dojo Blog

Firedocs RV Blog

the McMoneagles

LFR/CSL

RV Roast (alt)

RV Library

[Lee]

Some interesting stuff... some read very deeply into their keyboards.

[Jen]

Umm, when is the 2-8-10...?

Jen - I mean is that like... now or something else?

It might be nice to do a mission now.

[Marv]

February. The eighth. 2010.

[Rocky1990]

Na dann mal ran an den Speck.

[Jen]

Oh cool! Thanks Marv.


...Jen

[Glenda]

I thought the mission was very interesting and creative!  Wish we had done better as a group, but there was some confusion.  That seems happen with anything "personal" or whatever.  A hint or clue should be helpful but it seems to confuse us?  I do not know why, a newbie.  One, simple, straight foreward clue might help me, but remote viewing seems very tough to me so I need only nothing or a straight forward clue.  I struggle to find any target.  I love your missions though.  They make me think a little!  Thank you for allllll and your time and thought!

[Jen]

It was a really clever mission this week. So cool.

Glenda, it seems that when people are like minded (same rhythm if you know what I mean?) some how it makes a difference. I don't know what it is that gets people in sync with each other but (yeah - i have a great imagination. Told you didn't I?) it makes it easier some how.

Does any of that make sense at all?

I'm going to watch Avatar again on Saturday! In 3D too! I'm so excited about that!

Great mission was had by all - cheers... Jen

[Loraine]

Hi Glenda

Strictly speaking (in scientific and defining terms) if you are given ANY scrap of a hint or clue (even the opportunity to 'read' clues from the body language of anyone else who may already know what the target is) then you can no longer honestly conclude or claim that any perceived data came solely from remote viewing. The rational mind automatically analyses any tad of info to construct and feed educated guesses into the equation.  Given that it is the task of the rational mind to determine the flow of the session within the protocol (by determining AOLs, what to probe, when to put your pen down, space/time directions etc) then effectively in a front loaded session rationality is put back in charge of itself (albeit against your intention) and you're then negoitiating your target in the quagmire of the brain's awake default position ie engaged in self regulating logical thought processes.

As you can tell I'm strongly biased against front loading - so much so that I have never even tried to do a front loaded session, but what's much more important is the counter productive effect that publicised front loaded sessions do to the reputation and credibility of RV. Even someone completely convinced of the reality of remote viewing, can never eliminate the possibility of educated guesssing, so front loaded sessions stand no chance of confounding sceptics or scientists and it can be self defeating to publish them at all - it just distracts and detracts from the idea of claiming to have gained non-local information about an unknown target. (sorry to all for ranting)

With best intent
Loraine

[Glenda]

Loraine - Thank-you for the post.  I had to think about it a little because I didn't know the term "front loaded."  This is all a little eye opening to me - the science and methodology and the terminology.  Lee's sessions are always interesting to me.  Even in misses, I learn something new about RV.  Having no info seems to work best for me.  Perhaps it does for everyone.  I see your point about the guidelines so people take RV seriously.  Personally, I find skeptics a little funny which is probably a horrible attitude, but I think of an ostrich sticking it's head in the sand, visually, because it does not want to know.  Since I was little, which was over a few decades, that has always been my image.  Go figure.   That RV exists has never been a question to me.  How far we can push it and use it is the question to me.  But I am a newbie on the study and just learning.  So I read your post several times and found it very helpful!!