a successful arv example

RV Protocol

GO VIEW! @TKR's dojo

Project Home Page

RV webForum (here!)

Email: @Yahoo|@Google

Help make it possible for everyone!

TKR is Funded by:
PJ of Dojo Psi

Simple Session

CS Labs
Ingo Swann
Joe McMoneagle

Baylands Nature Preserve
Pete's Harbor Restaurant
Lucid Dream Example
Radio Listening Post
Test-Bed Trials
Video ABC Put to the Test

P.I.A.

Greg K's ARV Trials

RV Roast (alt)

RV Library

[Lee]

This is the session and feedback we used last night to predict the slight upset of the Lakers over San Antonio. Here was my bet at Vip.com:

03/24/2010  21:35 NBA ML-LA LAKERS to Win Even(115)
ML-LA LAKERS vs ML-SAN ANTONIO
ML-LA LAKERS 92 ML-SAN ANTONIO 83  

Here was my session:



Here was the feedback:






This is approximately our 20th event for the month of March and we are running 75-80% accuracy. The task number on the session reflects the date followed by a "1". The 1 indicates the first session for that day. If the session was too vague and the analyst couldn't make a positive id on one of the feedback targets then I would have sent him another session, date followed by a 2 and he would have judged the session against a completely different set of targets. The above session was originally meant for a game on the 23rd, but computer problems on his end bumped it to the 24th.

[Jen]

Oh Lee,

I can't see the session or the feedback.

Sorry... Jen

[Lee]

Ok, hopefully that fixed it. It was funny, I could see the images at my house in the thread and then got to work and couldn't. Oh well.

[Jen]

All good - I can see it now.

Cheers... Jen

[Jen]

But... I don't understand it.

Oh - hang on!

So the feed back represented the Lakers? Is that what you're saying?

Cause that's what your session looks like. Is that how it works?

Jen

[Lee]

So the feed back represented the Lakers? Is that what you're saying?

Cause that's what your session looks like. Is that how it works?

Yes, I tasked myself with the picture the analyst would send me should the Lakers win. If San Antonio would have won there would have been a different picture along with a hopefully accurate session.

[Jen]

Ok, thanks for that Lee.

Question...

The point of your exercise is to become so familiar with the 'knowing' - the way a session feels so to speak - as to how 'spot on' the shot-to-target may be during the viewing? That's why you are training yourself with feed back that comes after the session and not a monetary reward as such?

Like... Practise makes perfect type thing?

Jen

[Lee]

Question...

The point of your exercise is to become so familiar with the 'knowing' - the way a session feels so to speak - as to how 'spot on' the shot-to-target may be during the viewing? That's why you are training yourself with feed back that comes after the session and not a monetary reward as such?

Like... Practise makes perfect type thing?

No, the point of our excercises is to enable us to make predictions on the outcome of events so we can make better informed decisions regarding our wagering ventures. The brevity of the session reflects my attempt to pull the visual aspects of the target that would be most identifiable to the analyst.

[Jen]

Lee, I think i need help with this statement - it's too... personal for me to understand at this point.

the point of our excercises is to enable us to make predictions

So you don't want to know, you just want to get better at guessing?

The brevity of the session reflects my attempt to pull the visual aspects of
the target that would be most identifiable to the analyst.

This statement here is abit heavy - let me explain to you what i think you just said...

You are attempting to access the analyst's understanding by drawing what you think s/he will understand the best?

So then, the target is in you (you can see it) and you are doing the best you can do to read how best to communicate it to the analyst?

Is that close to what you just said?... Jen

*
What I mean is... that you're both learning the other's language type thing?

[Jen]

Oh no Lee! I think i get it...

The brevity of the session reflects my attempt to pull the visual aspects of
the target that would be most identifiable to the analyst.

1.You intuitively have the answer to the question.
2.To fill the task you need to target the feedback that best describes the answer to the task that's sitting there inside you.
3.The analyst then credits you with either a 'target A' or 'target B'?

Ok, how did I go this time?

Cheers... Jen

*
I'm still having a major problem with understanding why you still want to guess (predict) though

Username:
Password: