another example from last night

RV Protocol

GO VIEW! @TKR's dojo

Project Home Page

RV webForum (here!)

Email: @Yahoo|@Google

Help make it possible for everyone!

TKR is Funded by:
PJ of Dojo Psi

Simple Session

CS Labs
Ingo Swann
Joe McMoneagle

Baylands Nature Preserve
Pete's Harbor Restaurant
Lucid Dream Example
Radio Listening Post
Test-Bed Trials
Video ABC Put to the Test

P.I.A.

Greg K's ARV Trials

RV Roast (alt)

RV Library

[Lee]

how do you self task ?

Just write down a task number and attach a directive to it.

example: 4601-2018=describe focus of next photo I will view at the Dojo Psi.

[njbr]

ok, so the tasker simply pics 2 images and assigns the outcome of a game to those two images, correct ?  once you do a session you send the data to the tasker, ask him to send you the game info and outcomes/images ?

[Lee]

ok, so the tasker simply pics 2 images and assigns the outcome of a game to those two images, correct ?  once you do a session you send the data to the tasker, ask him to send you the game info and outcomes/images ?

Yes, that's one way you can do it.

We don't actually have a game targeted when I do a session. I will do a session, send it to the analyst and then call him to let him know it's in his email. Without looking at the session, he prepares his feedback photos. He assigns the letter "a" to one target and "b" to the other, then opens my session and compares it to the possible feedback. We confer, then open the books and pick a game to apply the session to. "A" will represent the team that comes 1st aphabetically and "b" the other team. If he thinks that my session matches the "B" team and we decide to bet on Dallas and Memphis, we will wager on Memphis. One advatage to this method is to allow the tasker/analyst to consider the session and feedback without his feelings about the teams at hand possibly hanging over his head.

[katzenhai2]

We confer, then open the books and pick a game to apply the session to.

How are you doing that exactly? Don't you think because knowing the "A" or the "B" team will win, you or the analyst will pick that game which he unsciously thinks (or favours) will be the winner? But well, on the other side, your track record shows there could be an advantage in this setup.

[Lee]

How are you doing that exactly? Don't you think because knowing the "A" or the "B" team will win, you or the analyst will pick that game which he unsciously thinks (or favours) will be the winner?

Quite the opposite. We take joy in betting on the underdog using this method. This last week we laid a moneyline bet that the Lakers would upset the favored Spurs which they did.

[njbr]

ok, let me see if I understand that correctly.

you RV a session, two outcomes, A and B

A means team x wins, B means team x loses.

tasker looks at the data and sees a match with image B, meaning team x will lose.

You then look at games and odds to determine which team to assign to x that will give the best payout ?

[katzenhai2]

A means team x wins, B means team x loses.
tasker looks at the data and sees a match with image B, meaning team x will lose.

You confuse me.

My version of what Lee does:
- RVing a session before photos were chosen. That is btw predicting not only the sportsbet outcome but also what pics will be chosen by the analyst after RVing.
- The analyst will chose (before looking at the session results, but after RVing) two distinctly different photos, one is A and the other is B. Most of the time it is only a drawing like circles or simple objects like knives.
- Analyst look at the session results and determine if it is A or B.
- A game will be chosen, ie. Utah-Washington. The "U" from Utah comes first in the alphabet before "W" of Washington. That means Utah is A and Washington is B.
- If the session results showed the A-Photo, Utah will win. If it shows the B-Photo, Washington will win.

Quite the opposite. We take joy in betting on the underdog using this method. This last week we laid a moneyline bet that the Lakers would upset the favored Spurs which they did.

So you chose sometimes (or always?) a game which the outcome shows the underdog would win? Like a self-fulfilling prophecy, because you RVed a game that was not determined before RVing?

[Lee]

Katz

- RV a session before photos were chose. That is btw predicting not only the sportsbet outcome but also what pics will be chosen by the analyst after RVing.
- The analyst will chose (before looking at the session results, but after RVing) two distintly different photos, one is A and the other is B.
- Analyst look at the session results and determine if it is A or B.
- A game will be chosen, ie. Utah-Washington. The "U" from Utah comes first in the alphabet before "W" of Washington. That means Utah is A and Washington is B.
- If the session results showed the A-Photo, Utah will win. If it shows the B-Photo, Washington will win.

That is exactly what we do.

[njbr]

The only part I don't understand is how you chose the underdog game. Do you take the results ie suppose team B is the winner, and apply that to all games top down until team B is an underdog team ?

[Lee]

The only part I don't understand is how you chose the underdog game. Do you take the results ie suppose team B is the winner, and apply that to all games top down until team B is an underdog team ?

Yes, that is exactly right.

Username:
Password: