Remote Viewing Unit

RV Protocol

GO VIEW! @TKR's dojo

Project Home Page

RV webForum (here!)

Email: @Yahoo|@Google

Help make it possible for everyone!

TKR is Funded by:
PJ of Dojo Psi

Simple Session

CS Labs
Ingo Swann
Joe McMoneagle

Baylands Nature Preserve
Pete's Harbor Restaurant
Lucid Dream Example
Radio Listening Post
Test-Bed Trials
Video ABC Put to the Test

P.I.A.

Greg K's ARV Trials

RV Roast (alt)

RV Library

[PsiSpy]

Greetings all,

Remote Viewing Unit latest video


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlbUR5DqdnI


Rick

[Daz]

cool

[tbone]

Has anyone done any outbounder stuff?  Does the outbounder consciously try to project info or do they just walk around and observe?  These outbounder things might explain some of the misconceptions about RV that I have seen.  Some people think RV is unethical beacuse you read peoples' minds (like that time travel guy, Bruce Goldstein might be his name).

[Sandra H.]

Hi T-Bone, This particular Out Bounder Experiment was done Pre-Cognitive, which means all the sessions were done (and sent in) even before a target location was selected. This should prevent 'telepathy' as in directly reading the Out Bounder's mind(s).

I hope this answers your question.

[tbone]

Yeah, but in the future when the outbounder goes to the location, does he try to project information or does he just walk around and look at suff.  I mean, could I pick a person as an outbounder who didn't know I was doing it and successfully see what they were looking at, or do they have to put some effort into projecting to make a viable session?

[PsiSpy]

Greetings T-bone,

Look at it this way, a RV'er sends a Session in one month prior to the die being rolled. This means that no one knows where they will be going until the day, approx 1 hour before the appointed time. So this equates to a "nil projection", quite simply the observers walk around the allocated location, that was decided by the throw of the die 1 hour before arrival at the location.


Hope this has simplified matters and made it clearer.

Regards

Rick

[Sandra H.]

Yeah, but in the future when the outbounder goes to the location, does he try to project information or does he just walk around and look at suff. 

No, the Out Bounder is just walking around. Although in this case of course they are participating in the Out Bounder project, there is no way they can influence or alter the sessions as the sessions have already been done!

I mean, could I pick a person as an outbounder who didn't know I was doing it and successfully see what they were looking at, or do they have to put some effort into projecting to make a viable session?

Yes, that is possible. Surveillance by Remote Viewing has been done succesfully many times, however people do have the right to privacy and you are putting yourself on thin ice when you do not ask the person's permission or use the information in an unlawful way.

[Ralph]

No, the Out Bounder is just walking around. Although in this case of course they are participating in the Out Bounder project, there is no way they can influence or alter the sessions as the sessions have already been done!

Hi psiforce

Suppose the die was rolled, target selected but no-one went to the selected target. Do you think there would be any change in the accuracy of the sessions (in comparison to when an outbounder went to the selected target)?

[Sandra H.]

Hi psiforce

Suppose the die was rolled, target selected but no-one went to the selected target. Do you think there would be any change in the accuracy of the sessions (in comparison to when an Out Bounder went to the selected target)?

Hi Ralph, That is a good question and in this case of course a hypothetical as this didn't happen. But...the Remote Viewers have not been tasked to describe the selected target, just where the Out Bounders will be at a given day and time. This means that even if the Out Bounders would never reach their selected target, the Remote Viewers should still describe their actual location (not the selected target location) at the given date and time.

Like I have said before, Remote Viewing Surveillance has been done successfully (to the degree feedback could be obtained) but of course due to privacy considerations we can not show those results in public. This is why it can be demonstrated with things like the Out Bounder Experiment.

[Slorri]

Hi psiforce

Suppose the die was rolled, target selected but no-one went to the selected target. Do you think there would be any change in the accuracy of the sessions (in comparison to when an Out Bounder went to the selected target)?

Hi Ralph, That is a good question and in this case of course a hypothetical as this didn't happen. But...the Remote Viewers have not been tasked to describe the selected target, just where the Out Bounders will be at a given day and time. This means that even if the Out Bounders would never reach their selected target, the Remote Viewers should still describe their actual location (not the selected target location) at the given date and time.

Like I have said before, Remote Viewing Surveillance has been done successfully (to the degree feedback could be obtained) but of course due to privacy considerations we can not show those results in public. This is why it can be demonstrated with things like the Out Bounder Experiment.

There's some food for thought.
What would be the target in that case?
I would think the selected target, and not where the out-bounder is, as there might be a lot on his mind anyways, and time is no factor.
As long as the target is selected at some time it should be it.

Username:
Password: