courtneys climat change project seem to be gathering momentum

Daz

Lives Here

Posts: 2534

courtneys climat change project seem to be gathering momentum

« on: June 17, 2012, 02:36:51 PM »

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-798548

http://www.maximumtheory.com/blog/2012/06/2012-remote-viewing-experiment/

http://covertress.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/global-disaster-predicted-by-remote.html


	Logged

Because I was recently asked if i actually remote viewed?

My website and rv sessions can be found here: http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote_viewing_results.htm

My Remote viewing blog here: http://www.remoteviewed.com/blog/

My RV magazine here: http://www.eightmartinis.com/

I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

PatMcDonald

Prolific

Posts: 573

Re: courtneys climat change project seem to be gathering momentum

« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2012, 11:58:05 PM »

Well, from my point of view, there appears to have been an ongoing global disaster, so if it turns out to be correct, I won't complain.

"A change is as good as a rest."


	Logged

tbone

Prolific

Posts: 565

Re: courtneys climat change project seem to be gathering momentum

« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2012, 09:47:39 AM »

Am I understanding him correctly in that he believes you can't RV the future without an outbounder consciously sending back info?


	Logged

katzenhai2

Lives Here

Posts: 1291

Ambassador

Re: courtneys climat change project seem to be gathering momentum

« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2012, 02:10:02 PM »

But if there are multiple universes shouldn't there be multiple outbounders sending back info - each sending different info?


	Logged

Remote Viewing Projects - Last Update: July 03rd, 2010

PatMcDonald

Prolific

Posts: 573

Re: courtneys climat change project seem to be gathering momentum

« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2012, 02:11:01 PM »

Quote from: tbone on June 18, 2012, 09:47:39 AM

Am I understanding him correctly in that he believes you can't RV the future without an outbounder consciously sending back info?

If so, I would like to know why. If a negative value for time is entered on physics equations, they still work.

So mathematically there is no reason why you could not remote view the future without a physical biological observer present. If you want to believe that consciousness alone determines reality, then it's a bit of a wonder how life actually gets started on new planets.

Having said that, having an observer present might make the process easier for the viewer. If the viewer themselves are present at the future event, that might make it easier still.

I am unaware if this has actually been researched under double blind conditions enough times to produce a statistically evaluable sample (I doubt it as it seems like a trivial matter to investigate and would need decades for viewers to die naturally and then check if their predictions post mortem were actually accurate).


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »