pjrv : Messages : 248-248 of 4038
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/248?)
2006/06/30 21:13:21

~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-PJRV_group---------

#248 
	From: Timelord2029...
Date: Sat Jul 27, 2002 11:46 pm
Subject: Re: Improving Target Contact 	psitrooper24
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Invite to Yahoo! 360° Invite to Yahoo! 360°
  	  	

>palyne...orizon.com writes:
> I think the FIRST GOAL of remote viewing is strong TARGET CONTACT on
> a psychic level.  The stronger the better.  The second goal is
> learning to communicate what you get from that contact.  I think the
> minute the communication process starts interfering with getting or
> keeping the "strength" of contact, it has exceeded its place in the
> process.

Hi PJ

so are you saying CRV is not upto the job in relation to
getting that strong target contact ?

I would also like to hear from HRVG members
(maybe glenn could comment here)
who could advise on how to get excellent visuals
for longer periods.

Thanks
Tunde

----------------
Moderator's Note: No, I am saying for the extremely left-brained ME, the focus
has to be the part I most need work on - target contact - not the part that is
actually pretty easy for me - communication in structure.  When I focus on
communication in structure, 'extreme contact' never seems to happen _in
protocol_ (it has happened out of protocol but that doesn't count, as there are
other non-psychic sources of info).... for ME. This may be that I need to be
more altered state to allow it, and I don't have data to GET me to advanced
stages in CRV prior to that point.  Or it may be something else.  But anything I
say applies to me first and generally.  Whether it applies to anybody else, is
really up to anybody else to conclude.  I believe that CRV relates to
communications -- that target contact is a matter of personal talent and
psychology leading up to it.  So the only real question is how using CRV might
affect the individual's psychology.  I'm so left-brain, it mostly just keeps me
there, unfortunately.  -- PJ