Search results

  1. katzenhai2

    When you are totally wrong, what is the probable cause?

    Oh. Yeah. What you are describing is very common. You talk about in-session-perceptions like [Lifeform] and then you describe the lifeform. The impression "old" comes to mind and then you unconscioulsy describe "old" and shift the focus away of the lifeform per se. Well, I tend to think now I...
  2. katzenhai2

    When you are totally wrong, what is the probable cause?

    Interesting read! I also tend to think there IS some target aquisition (sometimes) and it wasn't pure AOL - it feels the same like the correct session results but it doesn't fit to the feedback. Its not often but also puzzles me whats going on here. In addition to the sessions that do not fit...
  3. katzenhai2

    When you are totally wrong, what is the probable cause?

    Sounds like you are using TRV. I also sometimes describe a lifeform and from all the data (even S2, S4 etc) it looks it must be one, but then it was something round, a structure or whatever. There seems to be a stimulus that my decoding interpretated as a 'lifeform', maybe because of its...
  4. katzenhai2

    The Guy Predicting Stocks With An Army of App-Based Psychics

    'Remote Viewing Tournament' is highly known by several RVers on facebook. Best RVers tend to get 52-54% in ARV trials. Though most are not using CRV.
  5. katzenhai2

    Dead forum. :eek:

    Dead forum. :eek:
  6. katzenhai2

    Changing something in the past and will it affect the future or not?

    I don't know what "frequency" means. How that can be controlled etc. So I don't know what people are talking about when saying "frequency" or what that metapher means in terms of perception of the reality.
  7. katzenhai2

    Changing something in the past and will it affect the future or not?

    With RV you "change" the past with every session - but your future actions are already included into your past experiences. I've observed it several times. From my experience there are no "timelines". Only one objective reality. But I'm not so sure about the concept of multiple universes - not...
  8. katzenhai2

    Targ Confirms ARV casino winnings by Ed Dames students in his book

    Curve fitting (after the fact). Nice.
  9. katzenhai2

    Perdicting Future Events

    I haven't Targs book ... maybe you can shortly explain why the other team failed to repeat the success of Puthoffs ARV? I work alone. But my results seems to be in the same range than usual ARV - ~65%. I don't see any spectacular results or maybe I've done something wrong with the setup (well...
  10. katzenhai2

    What does training do to your RV skills?

    With more experience in my RV training visuals that I got in the beginning faded away more and more.
  11. katzenhai2

    -- The Dreaded 'Displacement' Problem --

    You were instructed to target the "cause" of the actual HARV session result and that couldn't lead to an answer like "take it to the bank". :)
  12. katzenhai2

    Perdicting Future Events

    Thank you for your clear advice! :)
  13. katzenhai2

    Perdicting Future Events

    Sounds plausible. Thx. I've started my own project with your method. We will see. ;)
  14. katzenhai2

    Perdicting Future Events

    I'm not sure it was mentioned earlier but where do you see the difference in your method and the following cue: "Next <Team A> vs. <Team B> NFL game / winning team's home town / most recognizable feature" ..beside the fact that here is a feature of the teams home town viewed. Maybe because you...
  15. katzenhai2

    Targ Confirms ARV casino winnings by Ed Dames students in his book

    Alex, I imagine the reason nobody seems to be interested is your personality style to post here on the forum... and bad memories last time of your appearance here... ;) No pun intended - only observation!
  16. katzenhai2

    NHL ARVs

    I'm not sure it was mentioned earlier but where do you see the difference in your method and the following cue: "Next <Team A> vs. <Team B> NFL game / winning team's home town / most recognizable feature" ..beside the fact that here is a feature of the teams home town viewed.
  17. katzenhai2

    Help someone stole from me! RV the thief plz =(

    The "numbers to the task" are context related to the person who assigned them. So even if the same number is assigned to two different targets you will only get one target and that is the correct one assigned to it. Its not about the number to RV...
  18. katzenhai2

    TKR EURO 2012 Project

    If you have done 100 trials (better 100 bets if there are passes in the trials) then I'm all ear to see your statistics. :) The proof is in there. Scientifically. No need to believe anything. But interesting to see that such an easy task was never done before... because we would have heared...
  19. katzenhai2

    RV by blind people...

    You don't "see" in Remote Viewing... you know...
Top