Brand new here

SteveMacDonald

New Member
Hi. My name is Steve and I am known on Facebook for my experiments in remote perception. Since 2012 I have set up a series of highly informal experiments that nearly cover the gamut of remote experiences. I don't use "protocols" and "targets" but simply make the effort to view, hear, touch, taste, smell and know things at a distance, both in the present and in the past.

My experiments are so lacking in controls that they would never be taken seriously by parapsychologists, but even so the evidence I've collected has become quite a sensation with participants.

My techniques are seat-of-the-pants simple and the results I get are entirely determined by the feedback from participants. A typical remote perception experiment I'd do is have people draw me a picture and then I'd attempt to describe it. Or I would have them hold an image of my eyes toward some scenery and I would try to use the eyes in my photo as a second pair of eyes to view the scene.

I have also done "remote house tours," "remote sniffing" and "remote tasting" experiments, some with greatly favorable feedback from participants, the majority of whom are total strangers.

I came to this site because of my interest in remote viewing. I do consider myself a remote viewer and a psychic. I have discussed my abilities with both Ingo Swann and Joe McMoneagle in years past.

If anyone is interested in my psychic experiments, they are easy to locate on Facebook.
 

Don

New Member
Hi. Welcome to TKR.

Your informal experiments sound interesting. It even sounds like some of them, if they are being done under double-blind conditions, would fall under the description of remote viewing - I'm using Joe McMoneagle's definition of RV here, in which any psychic discipline can be called "remote viewing" as long as it is carried out under scientific protocols (including scrying, tarot cards, etc.) Don.
 

isodusz

New Member
My experiments are so lacking in controls that they would never be taken seriously by parapsychologists, but even so the evidence I've collected has become quite a sensation with participants.
 

Marv_Darley

New Member
Staff member
Odd - why not implement some basic protocol / controls? Then surely your results will be all the more sensational by virtue of their scientific validity? Not hard to set up blind / double blind, surely...

Welcome to TKR btw :)
 
Top