Guys,
look, I like you are not happy with how Courtney presented, marketed and even the words he uses when he discusses this project, words that add a conclusion that RV should NEVER be used in the same sentence, words like PROVED.
BUT, the RV session data on its own without over the top analysis and absolute conclusions is what it is. Both Dick and I describe an advanced technology being used to create a magnificent pyramid structure. A pyramid structure is exactly what the target was.
Now, the bits we both describe that cant be verified (fully) yet do fit SOME of the presented theories towards the pyramid being built. I think we can all agree that at this time there is insufficient feedback to prove the accuracy of these parts. here for me I'm talking about a raised sand platform around the pyramid where blocks were move up, around and into place. AND the use of an advanced technology that seemed both noise, energy and vibration. But we do know there were stone blocks, and they were moved into place , by people so at least we know even a part of this is probably correct. What we dont know is if advanced tech was used.
Then there is the possible 'alien' component.
Now, I do describe 'travellers' form afar that bring tech/knowledge and that interact and change the local society. Becasue I use CRV I describe and didn't identify these as aliens - but as they were not form the indigenous land then they were clearly 'aliens' at some level because they were alien to the place. Were they real ET type aliens - this is open to interpretation and I can only honestly concede a maybe. I say this because the way they traveled and the advanced knowledge they shared - but its a maybe.
I still say - remove the marketing and personal/over the top analysis form this and there is still very good data - much of which absolutely fits a double blind target, with some data that needs further feedback to substantiate. remove the bullshit and look at the sessions both on paper and on camera and you have solid data with some that needs more feedback.
Now, to Overlay - Could Overlay have been a factor - yes - as a remote viewer and an amateur scientist (because im a remote viewer) I have to concede this. But just because it is a possibility it doesnt mean that this is what happened. I myself have a deep and long history connected with research into Egypt and the pyramids. I have been to egypt and have also spent time in the great pyramid - i spent an hr alone in the kings chamber in meditation amongst other things. Because of my personal knowledge of the target any of the more controversial and (more theoretical)data could also have come from me regarding advanced tech and/or aliens - if that's what it is. As This is partly my belief until I see clear historical evidence to the contrary. But again we dont even now if my personal knowledge/belief is involved in the Rv process..
SO, I dont mind the comments - dialogue is good and even more so when it gives a chance for people to do better next time. I'm just a viewer - I will work targets for good people and projects anytime. BUT I will back my RV tooth and nail, I have a solid track record of very good accuracy most of the time well over 80%.
To give you guys some context - this project came right after another that I did for someone also filmed on cameras - but this previous target had multiple cameras filming form every angle, for scientists/researchers - again done double blind and again both on camera and on paper the targets was accurately sketched and described - but again with this previous target some elements recoded need more feedback for verification - I'm recounting this as I was in the middle of a very accurate run of projects and targets with some of my best accuracy so far- all on camera and all in protocol.
Its not easy viewing double blind on camera and knowing that everything you do, say, record on film and paper will be on public display. My BLIND data on this is as far as I am concerned a great hit. Some of the data needs more feedback.
I'm with you guys I dont like how this has been presented - but this is out of my control - I cant remote view blind and also be involved in presentation and analysis.
We all still know So little about Rv and how it works, the role of taskers, telepathy and so much more.
TBONE:
Hey Daz, I skimmed your sessions and I missed seeing anything about a female praying mantis alien that didn't like you RVing her. Could you point me to which session it was or did CB make that up (which, frankly, wouldn't surprise me at this point)?
I didn't have any parying mantis type data in my RV - although id di have some data that could be some sort of adavanced race I called 'travelers' because they came form a very long way away and traveled in ships.
Also, your sessions clearly state "almost slave-like but not bound in chains but a lower caste life subserviant to others ", which I think perfectly describes a peasant class working for the ruling elites and priest class. Essentially slaves, but not necessarily technically slaves.
This is why I say to people dont read someone else s analysis - we all see completely different things when analysing sessions - look at the RAW data its all available for download for free, then decided but dont do it on someone elses point of view and analysis.
Daz