Stewart,
ndeed, there was little, if anything, new there.
Well, I didn't say that - I said it wasn't new to me - If a person had never done any ancient astronaut nor pyramid research before then there is alot of new stuff.
Daz, in no way am I questioning your abilities, but given you know this, do you think that it is possible that your own read up on book knowledge could have influenced you in the session?
Yes of course, but isnt this what makes each of us unique viewers - we all bring our 'life skills and knowledge' as rv skills - for example im an artist/graphic designer - hence my rv skills reflect this. I have seen doctors and nurses give amazing body/mind insights into target life forms because their life skills have given them the skills to do this. SO, yes part or all the rv data could have come form me - but part or all of it could also be real valid data...
1. Were any other Rvers used who failed to access this target? [Probably a question for CB I know]
First you should actually read/research the proiject before asking questions that cna easily be answered by actually doing so - then you wouldnt have to ask the sillier questions.
now, to answer - there were only two viewers, and both viewers described pyramids as targets- the target was a pyramid.
could it not be that possibly Courtney in his clear enthusiasm, immersed the coordinates with either (1) too much intent or (2) too much energy, thus enabling the two of you to access the target?
Yes, of course - we STILL do not know HOW RV works - not a clue. We still do not know how the viewer know how to accesses a blind target hidden behind coordinates, we DO KNOW that experiments become part of the experiments and that they CAN influence the outcome. Tis why RV needs to be embedded within and to work within its science protocol and not to move outside of it.
After all my years now doing this - Im not convinced Rv is anything more than simple telepathy between tasker and viewer.
I mean the Great Pyramid itself remains a strong and powerful energy source in our world today (look how it attracts honeymooners), you have a clear interest in it, and Courtney is somewhat enthusiastic. Clearly I don't know how Courtney tasked this to you, and it may be he was in no way involved with target selection, numbering etc. But with the right conditions it can be possible to connect directly through to the underlying energies that influence people/organisations and even nations.
Well first you should read about the project - then I wouldn't have to repeat and answer questions that dont really ned to be asked

AS to affecting and influencing me/us - NO its whey we work within science protocols of blind/double blind - we had nothing other than a single number, no hints, no chats, no face-to-face communications - in fact DICK and I were public enemies or sorts before this experiment afetr having a couple of public spats over the years about dicks HRVG group, and his very recent 'take the piss out of daz' youtube video - so I didn't feel particularly connected to all the people invovled in this experiment.
The fact that it was videoed live doesn't really add to scientific credibility, especially when what was found is the common stay of old school esoterics, parts of ufology, as well as many ancient legends of this planet, with lots of books written on it over the past few decades. neither does only 2 viewers. Perhaps 100 viewers, selected at random, with someone who has no interest in the pyramids or esoterics or ufology selecting the target picture, someone else equally detached numbering it and passing it on to random remote viewers, with all results being shown, would be more convincing.
Well, I disagree here. because the target was blind and on camera I clearly describe a man made structure in the past, being constructed by men is a slave/master-like relationship moving blocks into place to build this structure - all with sketches on a white board also backed-up with multiple paper sessions - I would class this as being credible????
You are saying all this with hindsight - remember we did not know what this target was - it was blind - it could have been anything!!!!!!!
The two of you might, as CB says, be the best remote viewers in the world today, and if you are good for you, but if the test isn't repeatable by others,....it isn't going to convince, far less be the pivot that Courtney had clearly hoped.
Ive never claimed to be the best - but I am ambitious and I aim to be the best viewer I can, and one day the best ( i know to some this sound egotistical but hey I have to have an aim) - this is my personal goal. I have many testimonials form people who are convinced I nail targets - in fact the project before this one I did was another target filmed on camera for a TV station - but actually nailed even more accurate than the pyramid one - again all BLIND on cameras.
Why isnt it repeatable - yes the 'solid' evidnece toward HOW the constriction occurred is scant and has more theory than 'actual' evidence - but the pyramids exist, they had makers - 90% of this target was feedbackable - so shy cant others do it - in fact as i said in earlier posts in this thread - i also did the very same target for TUNDE nine years earlier with similar results - look back through this thread to see the old rv session - so what does this say about tasker intent - when two rv sessions nine years apart for the same target, form different taskers come up with very much the same data?
If Courtney really wants to be at the cutting edge, work on how the pyramid energy has changed over the past decade and a half might prove fruitful - that has been fascinating to watch, but little published.
Also bearing in mind the stresses governments are under re aliens (thinking the mantis here that Courtney talks about from the RV sessions) with the USA denying everything, the Russian Prime Minister now disclosing (at first seemingly accidentally now if you watch the Russian youtube news videos with some frustration at having to repeat himself) how they do have a special forces team to interact with aliens on this planet today, the lower key disclosures made by various governments recently and the increasing number of pilots etc who are coming forward and saying "I tried to shoot one [a ufo] down." Not to mention the likes of the retired RAF chappy from the 1950s who is now publishing a book on how the RAF held aliens on behalf of America in the past. The talk of mantises in history, whether accurate or not, is largely being overtaken by events. Though clearly black technologies will explain a lot of such things.
Using the words "alien mantis" in the same sentence as "science", tends not to work. Why? Its career death to most scientists, though many would be happy to explore it if the funding was there. If Courtney (or anyone) was able to get Remote Viewers to show what our visiting friends were doing in the world today that would be a breakthrough. But again that is now old school knowledge and a good proportion of Rvers probably have a personal energetic connection anyway, for as Courtney rightly says - its genetic.
There is potential in what Courtney is trying to do, but he does, in my opinion, need to step up several levels, if he wants to have the impact he so clearly desires. Repackaging old stuff (aliens, genetics, pyramids) in a new wrapper (remote viewing as opposed to old school esoterics/new age beliefs) is not earth shattering.
Look, Im not going to bash courtney - I love the guy. Yes he makes mistakes - he is clearly not a marketer, his enthusiasm sometimes gets in the way. BUT in Rv I have never met a more honest and caring man than Courtney and I respect that. I dont always agree with what he does, hoiw he does things nor even in the analysis - but I can say that for most if not all my Project managers. Please remember he, I and others are doing this part time adn well as our day jobs and trying to LIVE - its easy to sit there are be judgmental, to pick things apart and criticize - but its not so eady to actually get involved to put yourself out there - to RV on camera blindly for christs sake - knowing that if you fail - everyone will see that fail.
Yes, mistakes have been made, yes things could be done better - but we dont have the unlimited time and $20M dollar budgets that SRI, SAIC and the STAR GATE program spent on projects and research, this is a handful of scattered dedicated people doing the best they can - I would say cut us some slack here and allow people to make mistakes - after all it how we learn isnt it?
When Ingo created CRV & RV he also tried to quit a target on a high and even in how he answered the correct/incorrect parts of the in-session analysis, he knew he had to be careful because too much negativity can kill. Now, I'm not saying dont criticize - but it does make me laugh when I see criticism when people haven't even read and video all the project data and how it was all done, How about SOME CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM for a change after all how many of the hundreds of viewers here will rv live of camera blindly and post their sessions online? LOL half the people still hide behind screen names and identities, fear of letting friends, family and colleagues know they are viewers.
I'm happy to answer questions - i really am but I ahve to be honest - I just View - I didn't analyze this project, I didn't construct it, not market it - i just viewed - and IMO viewed damn well for my second only time on camera for a blind target. Mistake were made by courtney - we can all agree on this, even courtney - but also ask yourself this, if courtney didn't do this, mistakes and all- what would you be seeing out there in the wild regarding RV research these last five years or so - how many of the other ' high and mighties' within Rv ahve you seen publish material, projects and stuff fully and in public?
I would work for them and in fact do - but it very few and far between and rarely fully sees the light of day.
Im saying all this because it gets tiresome, Do you realise how close I come to quitting every time I see the continuous digs and criticism, every single time - In know you all want more - I'd like to see more, id like projects to be more 'solid', But I cant be a viewer AND a project manager constructing more solid projects - if you really are that dismayed by Courtney production of projects then PLEASE create some yourself and show us how all to do it, because quite frankly the world has enough 'virtual' remote viewers and not enough 'actual' remote viewers & managers.
Stewart this wasn't a rant wholly at you, im just afraid i started ranting.
Daz