I'm actually going to try something with dowsing for the Powerball in the US, but mine is a long process and I'm still building a computer application for it. I have built a program that will generate binary numbers. I first dowse 25 binary numbers and then go to the program and enter one by one of the data I recieved from the dowsing to see what my percentage for getting each one right. I have done 400 numbers so far and have correctly guessed 239. That's a 59.75% guess rate. Standard deviation of 400 is 10 and I am passed 3 times the SD by 9 guesses. 99% of completely random guesses would fall under 3 times the SD from the mean on both sides. So, I'm pleased with my results. There's something else I have to check out first about my data (making sure the program was actually generating random numbers that would fall closer to the mean), and then I'll finish working on my other program. Once that program is done, I think at my rate with dowsing, I'll have to guess the numbers of a lotto two months in advance to fall under the SD for each binary digit (I'm converting the decimal numbers to binary). The program is being written in PHP-GTK, so, it should be compatible with any computer platform, but may need computer savy people to figure out how to set up the environment for it. If anyone is interested in it, let me know. I probably won't release it until after I've done my first test run on an actual lotto though. And, I'm setting it up just for the Powerball right now.
I wish the best for ya nw. I'll keep an eye out on your results.
Well, I did a test run for last night's Powerball with my binary system. Out of 500 trials, I got 247 correct. So, that's 49.4%, which is basically chance. I did rush it, but don't want to give excuses for failures. I'm going to hold off the program for the lotto system, and go back to polish my practice program. My practice program didn't include any timestamp. I want to use the timestamp to see if there are any differences in my performance based on time. I really want to know why some days I will consistently get 17 or 18/25 with the occasional 21/25, and some days just chance.
perhaps you got trapped by the "first time" effect with your new method. The first time you used it, your results were great because your sub was confident even if you were consciously skeptical. Now you are consciously confident but your sub is skeptical, effectively turning your accuracy to chance expectations. Maybe alternation is the key. Use a completely new, but still suitable method. The hardest but best way, of course, would be to convince your sub so you could keep any method.
That's why I placed my bet. I never played lotto, just did it now out of an impulse. I also never used this dowsing method. So maybe with some beginner's luck, I'll succeed. BTW, I had to pick slightly different numbers, because I didn't know exactly how to play lotto as I never did it before. I had to drop one of the numbers and decided to use 0 as "Superzahl", because I forgot to include it, but remembered having thought of it many timed during analysis.
...which means that I didn't even hit one of them! ;D
My method was quite simple. Write down the numbers row 1 thru 49 repeatedly, trying not to think of anything while doing this. Watch out for any signs of sudden alertness and draw a box around the number that caused the alertness. Repeat until no further signs of alertness are received.
Maybe the method just needs a tweak, but I guess it is totally unsuited. Well, in case I should give this another try, I'd go for RV next time. But that's gonna be difficult. I'd assume someone would have to prepare 49 largely different basic-gestalt targets for me which I don't know of...
Well, in case I should give this another try, I'd go for RV next time. But that's gonna be difficult. I'd assume someone would have to prepare 49 largely different basic-gestalt targets for me which I don't know of...
NW, if you want, we can try my ARV method. I can set up the binary tasks for each of your numbers and give you the coordinates. I'm not sure exactly how your lottery works. Looks like you have the first 6 numbers between 32 and 64 which would make 6 binary digits each for those numbers and I'm not sure what range your other 2 fall in. This means a lot of sessions using binary ARV. I guess it would still be possible to use trinary or quaternary ARV methods to lessen the amount of digits but personally I wouldn't go with anything higher than that. I would still randomize the digit placements so you wouldn't be frontloaded with what digit you are actually viewing. For those sessions that you didn't get close to any of the targets, I would retask you. The only stipulation I would have is to buy two tickets; one for yourself and one for me. ;D Let me know what you think.
I spotted this post @ HRVG.org, recently I also noticed some post relating to TKR, but it looks misinformed.. better to just disregard it
Dick Allgire posted this:
When I am dowsing for lottery numbers, I always get a -1 / +1 quantum flux on Ã‚Â a couple numbers usually, 60 % of the time if you drop a number, thats the better odds. Every April fool's Day I test myself this was 2007 result.
Lotto 03-31-2007 Ã‚Â 15, 22, 28, 37, 42, 49
These were my numbers:
Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â A line Ã‚Â 16, 22, 24, 34, 39, 51
Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â Ã‚Â B line Ã‚Â 15, 23, 28, 32, 37, 50 Ã‚Â
Line B was 3 right 2 off by 1 my own indecision got me, if you try your first or 2 nd ticket will hold any win every time.
6-16-2007 Fathers Day lotto attempt was 5 numbers off by one due to my experimental approach in lowering the number and again the infamous +1 / -1 quantum flux.
My numbers were 06-09-15-23-25-34
The win numbers Ã‚Â 07-10-16-22-24-13
When your only firing a single shot you tend to pay more attention to what your aiming at.
Seems you have the suit of numbers right in most of them like the 15, 16, 20's and the 30's.
I was told that your intentions had to be pure when it came to finding out spiritual information
about the future. If one is to find out the outcome of gambling events to win exessive amounts of money which they only plan to keep for themselves, then I dont think the sources of power allow personal gain such as that. If on the other hand a person is planning to win money to help others then it might be a different story.
I dont know what your intentions are if you were to win the lottery but I have heard it makes
a difference what ones intentions are if you are trying to use divining or RV to try and bag the jackpot. Anyone agree with this?
Now that is very interesting. In theory, the odds of that are no lower really than the odds of anything else. Just the synchronicity of numbers demonstrates probably more than chance though. Sorry if I didn't see it earlier in the thread, but what kind of method of dowsing were you using?
I was told that your intentions had to be pure when it came to finding out spiritual information about the future. [...] I dont know what your intentions are if you were to win the lottery but I have heard it makes a difference what ones intentions are if you are trying to use divining or RV to try and bag the jackpot. Anyone agree with this?
Well, since you ask. I think that's a lovely idea, but it doesn't seem to be true in my world (though I grant we all have rather subjective realities). One only has to have met lots of extremely successful, wealthy, miserably wicked people, and many altruistic, noble people in poverty, to suspect it's probably more about the belief systems of the individual than any cosmic in-line karmic adjustment going on.
If I wanted to find a remote viewer likely to win the lottery I would seek out someone who already had a tendency to manifest "chance good luck" in their life, since that would indicate they already had operating belief systems in place for that.
I see that this is an old thread, but this fits here. Here is a short article that I wrote many years ago. It was about a grand "first time effect." I may have posted it a long time ago at TKR.
Associative Remote View & Keno
Our deeper minds can perceive future events like lottery drawings. I've thoroughly proven this to my satisfaction. In 1993 I was doing some crude Remote Viewing experiments with friends. The Remote view process had no controls or protocols, we just closed our eyes and wrote down what came to us. The initial group of experiments were somewhat successful, but did not produce enough good data to win in a big way. I'd estimate that the chance of getting data this good at random from these preliminary experiments was about only one in a 1000.
In late October we were looking to expand the amount of data collected. My friend Jose wanted to play daily and thus we chose the local Washington State Daily Keno game. We chose a lottery game because it's basically impossible to cheat and if we got good at what we were doing we should be able to make some good money with it. We were about to get a tremendous "first time effect."
I designed an associative remote viewing process that used colors and shapes. We had been working with eight colors and needed more than just eight possible outcomes. So we chose a shape for most of the letters of the alphabet. A was for Arrow, B was for Boot etc. 20 shapes in all. I wrote several programs to have the computer do the associations and lookups etc. so that I could play also.
The first day that we used the system my friend came to my house and we "tried it out." I asked him to remote view 10 colored shapes for last night's drawing. We used a process where not every colored shape was associated with a Keno number. Later when I checked the colored shapes four of them were associated with keno numbers and all four were winning numbers on that previous night's drawing.
I then asked him to remote view 10 more colored shapes for that night's Keno drawing. When he did this two numbers "popped" in his head. He wrote those down along with the colored shapes. The 10 colored shapes turned into 8 Keno numbers. One of those matched a number that he got directly. So he had nine numbers for the up coming drawing. He wanted to play a ten spot ticket so he asked me to choose one of the numbers that I'd got from my remote viewing of colored shapes.
It turned out that both numbers that he got directly were to be winning numbers and seven of the eight numbers from the colored symbols were also winners. He played an eight spot ticket with the numbers that he got from the colored symbols and the ten spot ticket he added his winning direct number and my non winning number from my colored symbols. Thus he got seven out of eight on the eight spot ticket ($500) and eight out of ten on the ten spot ticket ($500).
I photocopied the tickets and a winning number printout before the tickets were cashed in. See the scan of them below.
I later calculated the odds against chance on my friends performance that day, he was 13 correct out of 14. The odds of that happening by random chance is only one in 19.5 million.
We continued to used this method for several months more with only a little success. This was a grand "first time effect." Yet, it proves very well that future lottery numbers can be perceived by our deeper minds.
Has anyone tried to RV or dowse CURRENT winning lottery numbers (the numbers for the last winning draw)? If you were successful doing that it would give some indication of whether the problem is because of a future event or because of difficulty with the numbers themselves. For example, if you successfully got the current numbers (without checking them first, of course) then that would seem to indicate that the problem with getting the numbers is because it is a future event. I'm going to try dowsing them but the only thing I have been successful at dowsing is water, so I wouldn't read too much into my results. Some people here seem to be fairly competent dowsers and might have better results.
I'm convinced that almost everyone has money blocks and fears. I've seen many times when things work re predictions or almost work. But, when it comes to making money in a significant way, it all stops or goes sideways. When one gets rid of the blocks and fears it all seems to just flow naturally and easily.
For instance, one man that I worked with had several past-life money traumas. Money was tight for him and his wife had cancer and he'd lost his decade long job. A few months or maybe even weeks after we cleared the old traumas, he was telling me about his new computer with an electronic hard drive (expensive) that he's just purchased. It's been about a year and a half and neither him or his wife have worked and they seem to be doing fine re money now.
How did they do it? I was not told. As I see it, it's not about future, it's about money traumas and blocks.
Has anyone tried to RV or dowse CURRENT winning lottery numbers (the numbers for the last winning draw)? If you were successful doing that it would give some indication of whether the problem is because of a future event or because of difficulty with the numbers themselves. For example, if you successfully got the current numbers (without checking them first, of course) then that would seem to indicate that the problem with getting the numbers is because it is a future event. ...