Hi Waterway and all

,
And as for feedback on stuff that never shows up, well, that isn't necessary.  The moment of knowledge of something is feedback enough.   Mr. McMoneagle got at this in that thread "What is Mr. McMoneagle talking about" or whatever its called....
Does any of that make sense?
Yes that does make sense.  Even partial feedback is feedback..maybe not final, but it goes into the memory of course, and could be accessed in that incomplete state.  For example, if FM theory is even partly accurate, and a Viewer did a session and the subsequent feedback was a picture of, say,  a UFO sighting....then that is what may well be picked up by the Viewer, thereby indicating reality....when in fact the feedback, although seemingly accurate at the time could turn out to be untrue (ie it could turn out to be a hoax sometime in the future). This would make the session very accurate, but the provision of info to a client perhaps....would be ultimately wrong.
I think care should be taken about that. Careful tasking/feedback provision to *final* event (even photo feedback is an event) may help compensate for that, and needs to be thought about I think. Whatever....but noone yet knows how we get the info, and  it would pay to keep it in mind and retask accordingly before believing some of the more outlandish session results we all get ÂÂ
Also the better the feedback then the better the session, perhaps; depends on the quality of the Viewer though of course. That is paramount. If you want a better chance of a good session though, then be sure the feedback is good...and not confused by additional detail.
For example, I did a session for someone a while back, and when I got the mail with the feedback the first paragraph was about something that went on at the feedback meeting...........and guess what I had picked up on..

. Fairly accurately I was pleased to observe...but it rendered the actual Viewing (which was an experiment), totally useless. Feedback should be provided as carefully as tasking is made. Not enough attention seems to be paid to that. People talk about 'overlay', and I think that is how it could happen.
Maybe to make a fuss at feedback time would help with accuracy too.....to be sure to make feedback somehow  *memorable*

. I think this has been recognised for some time in RV, because I have heard it said before. It may be better if it happens 'accidentally' too...ie. if the person providing the feedback makes it stand out, or if the event is more memorable (which is why I think operational targets can produce better results...they make for interesting feedback). The Viewer could try to make a feedback occasion memorable him/herself too...by paying close attention to the feedback photo for example...but overdoing it by searching on the web for additional info etc is probably not a good idea as you may get bits of this and that going into your memory....which although maybe picked up in the past, doesn't really make for an accurate session.
When doing that sort of thing (searching the web) at feedback time, I've ended up seeing other photos that had nothing to do with the intended feedback but I have found interesting....and have recognised bits of in my session....I'm trying for accuracy, so now I try to stick with the intended (and hopefully final) feedback.
Remember these are just my opinions based on my own experiences. Others will probably have had different experiences, but some may have noticed the same thing.
Wow there has been quite a discussion here....I have been off line almost all week, and on holiday (vacation) the week before, so I have a lot of catching up to do. Later I will go back to the beginning and start with PJ's reply.
Some intriguing mails. I've just skimmed over them so far...and there are loads more threads on the site too. Oh woe! Will I ever catch up??

).
BTW..If anyone is installing McAvee Security System over Windows and they can't get some of the web-functions to work either then consider me an expert....<sigh>. :-/.
Still the thing is working fine at the moment...and said it stopped a hack attack too; so it must have been worth it

.
Later...better get reading and some posts done before my 'puter goes base over apex again.
Kind regards,
Glyn