Missing Malaysia flight a mystery

Chakra

New Member
I haven't seen any mention of this on the forum as yet.....

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-26510027

Some C&P from the article.

Malaysia's civil aviation chief has said the fate of a missing Malaysia Airlines jet remains "a mystery".

Azharuddin Abdul Rahman said officials had not ruled out hijacking as a cause of the plane's disappearance.

The possible sighting of a yellow life raft was investigated on Monday, but was found to be an unrelated object.

Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 vanished from radar almost three days ago en route to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur, with 239 people on board.

Relatives of the missing passengers have been told to prepare for the worst.

---------------
"In calm seas, if there were a soccer ball [football] or a basketball floating in the water, the radar could pick it up. They [flight recorders] typically have a radio beacon and so for example our P3 [radar] - if they are flying within a certain range of that - will pick up that radio beacon. We have not yet picked up anything, but that's typically what those black boxes contain."

There are now 40 ships and 34 aircraft from nine different nations taking part in the search in the seas off Vietnam and Malaysia.

Late on Sunday, the Vietnamese authorities said two objects had been sighted in waters south of Vietnam which appeared to resemble aircraft parts, including a door.

The debris was in a similar area to a possible oil slick seen by Vietnamese navy planes on Saturday.
 

Slorri

Member
Firstly, hijacking a plane does not make it disappear from radar.
Secondly, an explosion would leave a whole lot of floating debris, easily detectable, in particular by planes following the same rout.
 

Chakra

New Member
Slorri said:
Firstly, hijacking a plane does not make it disappear from radar.
Secondly, an explosion would leave a whole lot of floating debris, easily detectable, in particular by planes following the same rout.
Exactly - think thats why they are still deeming it a mystery.
 

Slorri

Member
It is a mystery. And it is also highly suspect.
From the start the media and the official focus was on two stolen passports.

The passports appears to be a distraction argument, a "strawman".

The radar shows the plane, and then it disappears. The plane on the next day is also shown, and that also disappears from the radar.
If they can remove things from the radar, then they might also be able to put things into the radar.

Remember the false planes at 9/11.
 

Kiara

Member
If he was asked to help... why is he asking for other people help on his facebook page??

What happened to his famous abilities???? 8) ;D 8)

If someone on facebook gives him the real location of the plain... will he (Yuri) claim credit for that???
 

Tunde

"Keep Moving Forward"
Slorri said:
Firstly, hijacking a plane does not make it disappear from radar.
Secondly, an explosion would leave a whole lot of floating debris, easily detectable, in particular by planes following the same rout.
Not as simple as that. If that was the case how come it took over a year to locate the wreckage of Steve Fossetts plane which crashed on land? - Had it crashed in the ocean we would probably be having the same conspiracy theories being banded around today over the missing malaysian plane.

Accidents happen - Planes crash all the time - Black boxes are not 100% crash proof.

Secondly, talking about it on a Remote Viewing forum is not a good idea as it will pollute viewers with the lastest conspiracy theory of the day. Last i heard some Malaysian shaman blammed it on elves...really? Elves ? sigh.


T
 

Mycroft

Active Member
Tunde said:
Slorri said:
Firstly, hijacking a plane does not make it disappear from radar.
Secondly, an explosion would leave a whole lot of floating debris, easily detectable, in particular by planes following the same rout.
Not as simple as that. If that was the case how come it took over a year to locate the wreckage of Steve Fossetts plane which crashed on land? - Had it crashed in the ocean we would probably be having the same conspiracy theories being banded around today over the missing malaysian plane.

Accidents happen - Planes crash all the time - Black boxes are not 100% crash proof.

Secondly, talking about it on a Remote Viewing forum is not a good idea as it will pollute viewers with the lastest conspiracy theory of the day. Last i heard some Malaysian shaman blammed it on elves...really? Elves ? sigh.


T
Not quite, there is a crap load about this which makes it way different.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/11/malaysia-airlines-370-passengers-cell-phones/6285325/

Mycroft
 

letsmeet2.0

New Member
Kiara said:
If he was asked to help... why is he asking for other people help on his facebook page??

What happened to his famous abilities???? 8) ;D 8)

If someone on facebook gives him the real location of the plain... will he (Yuri) claim credit for that???
uri geller is no remote viewer...
 

Solaris

New Member
I think many people here did the session already or at least have some feelings about it but as Tunde said it might pollute the other viewers perception so no one is posting it here. I was very curious, so after I had done mine (which was not blind so it was not the CRV but anyway some kind of viewing) I started to look elsewhere and found one session which was extremely similar but I guess options are very limited so it does not surprise me, unless we are talking about other dimensions and so on.
Anyway it would be interesting to see other people's views and the type of cue they made maybe as a collection of sessions temporally unavailable until the truth (?) emerges.
 

Chakra

New Member
Slorri said:
Even Amelia Earhart was lost in that neck of the woods, back in 1937, not found yet.
I did a blind session in a class with a Angela on Amelia. The results I got were very interesting, during the session I was getting a lot of sudden and sharp chest pains, as well as a heavyness with trouble breathing. There was a long sandy road and a real annoying guy that was a bit of a jerk. White spinning objects. I drew an ameba like object. People dressed in white.

Anyways I sort of deduced that she had landed was really sick, had been in a hospital? like setting, and then had possibly been shot in the chest from the sharp sudden pains in the chest. There was also a sense 'I am not suppose to be here' 'someone? doesn't like that I am here'. It all made more sense after I found out who I was bilocating into. lol
 

Chakra

New Member
Tunde said:
Slorri said:
Firstly, hijacking a plane does not make it disappear from radar.
Secondly, an explosion would leave a whole lot of floating debris, easily detectable, in particular by planes following the same rout.

Not as simple as that. If that was the case how come it took over a year to locate the wreckage of Steve Fossetts plane which crashed on land? - Had it crashed in the ocean we would probably be having the same conspiracy theories being banded around today over the missing malaysian plane.

Accidents happen - Planes crash all the time - Black boxes are not 100% crash proof.

Secondly, talking about it on a Remote Viewing forum is not a good idea as it will pollute viewers with the lastest conspiracy theory of the day. Last i heard some Malaysian shaman blammed it on elves...really? Elves ? sigh.


T
Sorry not my intent - I was taught to put any polluted targets in an envelope in a pile of other practice targets picked randomly they still can be done blind.

I have heard Lyn say that a good remote viewer has to learn to get past being polluted, they had to do polluted targets all the time. In that sense a person needs to practice being polluted and also learn how your mind works with that. For example if a police officer asks to remote view something odds are you've heard about it in the news or you know its probably something bad. Like a missing person or child. Your mind would probably race with possiblities. Definitly makes it harder mind you but good practice none the less I think. :)
 

AlexDiC

New Member
I did a session.. a quick 10-12 minute set {Missing Malaysia plane/current location}.

I acquired a target site that is remote and isolated. A flat area (I assume a runway) with a massive secure rectangular building, cool dark, corrugated and enclosed. It's dry, has yellow and golden colors,

That doesn't sound like a crash site to me.

The nearest recognizable feature is a man made vertical element.
 

Chakra

New Member
AlexDiC said:
I did a session.. a quick 10-12 minute set {Missing Malaysia plane/current location}.

I acquired a target site that is remote and isolated. A flat area (I assume a runway) with a massive secure rectangular building, cool dark, corrugated and enclosed. It's dry, has yellow and golden colors,

That doesn't sound like a crash site to me.

The nearest recognizable feature is a man made vertical element.
If you have free time I would dowse a location and then google earth it :) would be interesting if you saw that building again.
 

AlexDiC

New Member
That all the interest I have in the missing plane.. It's not anything that would be fruitful.

I did Bin Laden's location 2005.. It was where they found and killed him years later. My work was pretty good but at best narrow it down to a million places that look like tat on the earth. So not very helpful. Same with a task like this missing plane.. foolish pursuit..

Check it out: Like I said "on target" but not very useful..
 

Attachments

Tunde

"Keep Moving Forward"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2579524/Chinese-satellite-finds-suspected-crash-site-Malaysian-Airlines-flight-370-South-China-Sea-did-three-days-release-them.html



Possible Crash site now pinpointed - Hopefully this will stop the crazy conspiracy theories.

If you watched History channels Aircraft Investigation or Seconds From Disasater you would know there
are way too many reasons for planes to go down. Anything from incorrect altitude readings to
pilot error and new mechanical failures being discovered all the time.

In many instances the pilots are unaware of any impending danger till its too late even to send
out a distress signal. The worst ones are when the instruments do not give correct readings and the pilot switches control to auto - pilot - In that instance the plane could literally run itself straight into the sea if the pilots were not paying attention or were distracted especially when flying at night.

Hopefully they will now recover the black box because it is crucial they find out what
happened to the plane leading upto the crash in order to avert similar failures in the future.

T
 

AlexDiC

New Member
No wreckage found in the water.

With all these "viewers".. that visit this site....why am I the only one that posted their work. Only takes 10 minutes.

I heard last night on coast to coast both host and expert guest... both thought it landed.

This morning I heard there is evidence the plane flew for 5 hours after transponders where turned off. Plane is worth $230 million. Add anothe $239 million, 1 million per passenger ransom. . Could be someone's idea of a get rich quick scheme. .

Makse me think that there really aren't any viewers here.
 
Top