The RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion List Archives

pjrv : Messages : 3587-3597 of 4038 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/3587?? )
?006/07/01 15:51:?3

~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-PJRV_group---------

#3587
 	From: "Elizabeth Hambrook" 
Date: Sat Dec ?0, ?003 8:11 am
Subject: Coincidence 	ozblueriver



Hi

I just went back to p-i-a.com to read the other two articles I mentioned in my
last post and this is what I came across. LOL

What a coincidence considering I had been thinking along those lines in that
post yet hadn't read this particular article yet. LOL

Liz

"...  it is our view that what is going on in all Remote Viewing is a
transaction involving everyone defined by intention and agreement as being part
of the experiment.  We are in essence faced with an engineering problem in which
a bio-circuit made up of all participants is created by intention.  ...
Practically, this means what everyone feels, thinks, and intents is a factor in
the protocol."

Stephan Schwartz and Randall J. De Mattei--The Mobius Society

------------------
Most of the 'masters and entities' in the metaphysical world have been saying
that sort of thing for a couple centuries now as well.  That every person
involved in a given topic or event or thing is a part of a sort of conglomerate
energy, like a group thoughtform.  PJ

	
#3597
 	From: Bill Pendragon 
Date: Sat Dec ?0, ?003 8:0? pm
Subject: Re: Coincidence 	docsavagebill



Hi Liz and all,

Interesting articles you posted. Apparently Pat Price
was able to view two targets for which he NEVER had
any feedback quite successfully. I think that is
pretty clear evidence that feedback is not necessary.

Best Regards,

Bill

-----------------------
Proves it isn't always necessary, yes. Maybe much can depend on viewer skill.
And that doesn't mean it never is necessary, or is not needed and/or useful in
general. It just means that a kickass viewer who died without feedback has
proven (by doing so? ) that he could hit the target anyway.  'Course there's no
way to know, he might have gotten different, or more, info if he'd gotten
feedback. :-? ) And then there is the issue of time--if shortly after death we
'know all', is our foray into the future for feedback limited to our body's life
span? :-? )  PJ