pjrv : Messages : 3491-3491 of 4038
#3491 From: Edwin Kuprienko
Date: Sat Jul 1?, ?003 7:?8 pm
Subject: Communication with subconciousness and RV edwink911
When we worked on RV we noticed problem created by displacement. We would have a
perfect hit on target, except that it was wrong target.
For example we had 4 pictures defined in target pool, that we did not see before
RV session. Random generator would select one picture after we finished RV. Most
of viewers would hit wrong picture, but would describe it in great detail.
In this case the picture was the first one, top, on the left, so somehow it had
most of appeal, even as it was not selected as target by random generator. The
displacement would be called by bigger appeal of this picture versus the
I was thinking about validation of RV, even as Skip mentioned that there is no
easy resolution to this problem.
I worked for years with pendulum and switched to mental images that I would
receive from sub consciousness in place of pendulum movement.
I decided to use the same protocol to validate target. It worked for me
perfectly for one day with 100% accuracy. So for example I would start RV, would
check if I am connected to target (confirmation form SC? ), if not try again.
Collect RV data, check again how accurate it is (I would get sort of rating
what percent is correct few times I thought that I was a way off but I had
rating that was OK, even if it was not perfect, so I went to Skip to review it
there would be a number of lakes of different size, I would have a number of
circles, but not in exact location and size as lakes and some circles
overlapping, he said it is not bad, even as I thought it was terrible? ).
Working with this process I would promise specific reward to SC, if I get
correct answers. However then the reward could not be delivered immediately and
the process started coughing. It still worked but with lower accuracy.
At this point I realized that part of problem is to treat SC as separate entity.
It has to be treated as integrated part of our personality and rewards have to
be at a very simple level.
Joe M in his book recommended eating sweets only if RV session was on target.
This is really the same idea, just without defining SC role.
I have had quite busy time in last few days so I am going back to work on this
I would described it shortly as:
See your consiousness, subcounciousness and superconciousness as aligned.
working together and integrated with your mental processes to deliver the best
Define reward (and again it is extremely important simple reward like
sweets? ) if you get good hit.
Deliver reward after getting results.
You need to define your own messages I have open eye for start of RV, black
glasses for off target and my top-secret message for confirmation and rating.
On top of that it seems that right brain has better connection to
subconsiousness and right brain to analysis of RV data. So aligning this
communication also helps (TMI hemi synch technology? ).
As I will keep working with this approach I will gladly post updates.