pjrv : Messages : 3554-3554 of 4038
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/3554?)
2006/07/01 15:41:32
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-PJRV_group---------
#3554
From: "Glyn"
Date: Mon Dec 1, 2003 6:27 pm
Subject: Glyns Retro-tasking experiment #3 -
Part 2 glynis5799
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Invite to Yahoo! 360° Invite to Yahoo! 360°
Hello all,
Here is Lizs reaction to the results of Exp #3 an
d my comments.
Liz mentions that she thought her original session was quite accurate and that
there was not anything really obvious from the retro-tasking feedback in her
session this time. I was hoping there would not be.
-----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth Hambrook
Sent: 01 December 2003 10:1
To: Glyn
Subject: Re: Retro-tasking experiment #3
Hi Glyn,
well that was interesting too because that session was pretty spot on. there are
odd things in it that don't make much sense if you don't have the photo but most
of the session was relevant. Basket for example was an AOL of the pattern in the
bricks. Prison came about because our local prison is a bluestone building.
Anyway I'm thinking that I must have been totally focused on the target this
time. The other sessions 'seemed' to be a mixture of your target and mine. So
Joe M might be right when he said RV boils down to focused attention to the
target and no one should be able to sway you from that by throwing a
retro-tasking into the works.
-----Original Message-----
From: Glyn
Sent: 01 December 2003 19:12
To: Elizabeth Hambrook
Subject: RE: Retro-tasking experiment #3
Hi Liz,
Yes, we are in good company then :-). In this weeks experiment I asked you to
send me an older session because I wanted the time-span between the intended
target feedback and my feedback to you to be as wide as possible&.so if your
focus had gone further ahead in time than the real target feedback, then
hopefully it had not gone so far as to have picked up any of your future
memories of this later feedback. Well the result was as hoped for, but whether
that means you focused well or it was chance it is not possible to say.
OK Liz, could you please send me another old one. Again no hurry.
|