RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion, Yahoo Groups.
Source Location: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/
Filetype: Archive. Topic: Remote Viewing. Blocked: by topic detail.
Archive Storage: www.firedocs.com/pjrv/ and http://www.dojopsi.info/pjrv/
Archivist: Palyne PJ Gaenir (PJRV, Palyne, Firedocs RV, TKR and the Dojo Psi.)

begin archive

pjrv : Messages : 3554-3554 of 4038
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/3554?) 2006/07/01 15:41:32


From: "Glyn" Date: Mon Dec 1, 2003 6:27 pm Subject: Glyns Retro-tasking experiment

#3 -

Part 2 glynis5799 Offline Offline Send Email Send Email Invite to Yahoo! 360 Invite to Yahoo! 360 Hello all, Here is Lizs reaction to the results of Exp

#3 an

d my comments. Liz mentions that she thought her original session was quite accurate and that there was not anything really obvious from the retro-tasking feedback in her session this time. I was hoping there would not be. -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth Hambrook Sent: 01 December 2003 10:1 To: Glyn Subject: Re: Retro-tasking experiment #3 Hi Glyn, well that was interesting too because that session was pretty spot on. there are odd things in it that don't make much sense if you don't have the photo but most of the session was relevant. Basket for example was an AOL of the pattern in the bricks. Prison came about because our local prison is a bluestone building. Anyway I'm thinking that I must have been totally focused on the target this time. The other sessions 'seemed' to be a mixture of your target and mine. So Joe M might be right when he said RV boils down to focused attention to the target and no one should be able to sway you from that by throwing a retro-tasking into the works. -----Original Message----- From: Glyn Sent: 01 December 2003 19:12 To: Elizabeth Hambrook Subject: RE: Retro-tasking experiment #3 Hi Liz, Yes, we are in good company then :-). In this weeks experiment I asked you to send me an older session because I wanted the time-span between the intended target feedback and my feedback to you to be as wide as possible&.so if your focus had gone further ahead in time than the real target feedback, then hopefully it had not gone so far as to have picked up any of your future memories of this later feedback. Well the result was as hoped for, but whether that means you focused well or it was chance it is not possible to say. OK Liz, could you please send me another old one. Again no hurry.

// end archive

Top of Page