pjrv : Messages : 3528-3529 of 4038
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/3528?)

 15:30:08

~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-PJRV_group---------

#3528
 	From: Steve Chris 
Date: Fri Aug 8, 2003 9:51 pm
Subject: Off topic question 	pixelpro...urf.com

  	  	

Greetings All,

I have a simple off topic question.

Assume some proficient RV'ers conducted sessions to target things like a
specific elements' atomic number, a chemical formula, or the Fourier
transform of an actual electronic signal.
Would the sessions produce data about just the representation used
(number/formulae/transform) or would the session data be more relevant
to the actual nature and physical manifestations of the element,
compound, waveform, etc...?

Can anyone recommend any books or articles that provide insights into
targeting and monitoring techniques to obtain desired results?

If this kind of question was previously discussed and I missed it or
this is not the place for such a query, please forgive me.

Best Regards,

Steve

Reply | Forward
	
#3529
 	From: Bill Pendragon 
Date: Sun Aug 10, 2003 4:09 pm
Subject: Re: Off topic question..NOT 	docsavagebill

  	  	

Hi Steve,

First, this is a topical question for sure. Sessions
rarely would produce numbers or formulae or even
writing..they produce sensory output almost
exclusively, pictures, words, smells, feelings,
sounds, tastes. So if you wanted a chemical
formulae..it might come thru as some geometric
arrangement..but the viewer might have a hard time
getting it exactly right since they are blind and it
would be complicated. If you want to use RV for
science, you need to ask a question that can be
answered by some sort of simple sensory output or
possibly use ARV IMO.

Best regards,

Bill
--- Steve Chris  wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> I have a simple off topic question.
>
> Assume some proficient RV'ers conducted sessions to
> target things like a
> specific elements' atomic number, a chemical
> formula, or the Fourier
> transform of an actual electronic signal.
> Would the sessions produce data about just the
> representation used
> (number/formulae/transform) or would the session
> data be more relevant
> to the actual nature and physical manifestations of
> the element,
> compound, waveform, etc...?
>
> Can anyone recommend any books or articles that
> provide insights into
> targeting and monitoring techniques to obtain
> desired results?
>
> If this kind of question was previously discussed
> and I missed it or
> this is not the place for such a query, please
> forgive me.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve
>