pjrv : Messages : 3566-3566 of 4038
#3566 From: "Glyn"
Date: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:41 pm
Subject: Retro-tasking experiment
#7 - Part 2 glynis5799
Hello again all,
Lizs comments about the result of
#7 are below, and my reply underneath.
I am acutely conscious that you are having to take my word for all this, but it
is honestly the way things came out. If it was purely chance then fair
enough&but no, I think there is more to it on this occasion&&something went
right it seems (maybe because of a change in procedure), but goodness knows
Well I think Liz definitely agreed it was a better one! LOL! Im printing her
mail in full because if we dont get another result like this, at least there
was one :-).
Three more to go then :-).
From: Elizabeth Hambrook
Sent: 15 December 2003 10:54
Subject: Re: Retro-tasking experiment #7
Hey Oh WOW,
this is remarbable to say the least!! If you put session
#7 to your retro-target
it's spot on. I would take that as being a very good session. There is even the
straight line on a 45deg angle. Far out!
And you say someone else got catapilliar! Man! What is that saying? How could
everyone get retro-tasked if your intent was only to retro-task me? This is
Could you possibly go through all the other sessions for that target and put
them up on PJRV so we can check them out too? I'm not sure if you would have to
ask everyone first.
Those veins do look like wires in an RV sort of way. I remember Dave Humpries
got something similar to my 'wires out side of head'. But it was worded
Glyn, I'm agog. I'll look forward to the conversations that will come out of
this one. LOL
From: Glyn [mailto:glyn.flyers...net.com]
Sent: 15 December 2003 18:48
To: Elizabeth Hambrook
Subject: RE: Retro-tasking experiment #7
Well that was a better one, glad you agreed. Yes, if you had got the caterpillar
as your first target it would have been really good back then. But it is really
good right now IMO! Its still your session and your RV ability, just a bit
further down the timeline& you just found this target more interesting and
skipped over the intended one thats all&if FM theory is correct that is. :-).
Id better not go publishing the sessions of the others, but I may mail them for
permission to do a comparison a bit later on.
Well Ill try and do the next one the same way I did this one and see what
happens next time. There are some variables raising their heads here.. but I
just cant tie them down. Ill mail you for another session soon.
Youre a good viewer Liz..if no ones ever told you that then they should have